Finland Firing Line Fischer, Louis Russian State Party newsletter edited by Fischer Fish, Hamilton Fisher, Charles circa Fisher, Wesley Honsinger Fishermen Fitzgerald, Albert J. Fitzpatrick, Thomas Flag desecration Flaxer, Abram circa Fluoridation Foley, Martha Foley, Thomas circa Fonda, Jane Food stamps Foote, Wilder Ford, James W. Ford Sunday Evening Hour Radio program Foreign agents registration Foreign Policy Association Foreman, Carl Forged document reproductions Forged stamps and currency notes circa Central Intelligence Agency report Anti-Soviet Forgeries Forgeries relating to Germany Forman, Harrison Forum for Marxist-Leninist Struggle Foster, William Z.
Foundation Church of the Millennium De Huszar, George B. Information Agency publication National Better Business Bureau reports Four Continent Book Corporation International internal bulletins International Executive Committee issuances United Secretariat issuances Security and the Fourth International publication series Fourth International Posadas pamphlets Fraenkel, Osmond K. Writings by Fraina Interview transcript of Fraina Stenographic transcript of Communist Party trial of Fraina Department of Justice hearing transcript re Fraina Letter by Jacob Nosovitsky Government surveillance of Fraina Rossi, A.
Bulletin d'information sur l'intervention clandestine Central Committee Meetings Wolton, Thierry, La France sous l'influence Frank, Charles undated. Frank, Karl Paul Hagen Frankfurter, Felix Franklin, Sylvia Frantz, John M. Frederick Douglass Educational Center Free School of New York Free Society Group of Chicago Freedom League Freeman, Frank N.
Freeman, Joseph Freemasons Friday circa Friedan, Betty Friedman, Morton Friends of Democracy circa Friends of German Freedom Friends of National Russia Soviet Russia originally published by the Soviet government. Soviet Russia Pictorial Pamphlets circa Friends of the New Germany Issuances Communist Party, U. Russian archive documents Anti-communist sources Mainstream press printed articles Frolik, Josef Front Frontline Political Organization Fuchs, Klaus Fulbright, J. William Fund for New Priorities in America Fund for Open Information and Accountability Fund for Peace Hofstadter, Samuel H.
Bibliography on the Communist Problem in the United States Ellsworth, Ralph E. Report on the Fund for the Republic" American Legion report title excised circa House Committee on Un-American Activities study circa Funding Exchange Gailmor, William S. Gannett, Lewis circa Garlin, Sender Garrison, James A. Gates, John circa Gebert, Boleslaw General Strike for Peace Generale fur den Frieden George, Harrison Georgia Gerard, Tom Junges Volk youth group publication Mailing lists Registration data for automobiles parked near Deutsches Haus, Los Angeles German American League for Culture German American Republican League Deutsche Zeitung Miscellaneous serial issues General circa General - circa Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands internal documents.
Internationale Agitator Oktober Rote Aufbau Proletarische Sozialpolitik Propagandist Unsere Zeit Deutschland-Information Thalmann, Ernst. Reden und Aufsatze zur Geschichte des deutschen Arbeiterbewegung. Volumes An Stalin: Briefe aus dem Zuchthaus, bis Kommunistische Arbeiter-Partei Deutschlands Roter Frontkampferbund Baumert, Walter.
Rohl, Klaus Reiner. Weber, Hermann. Weber, Hermann and Andreas Herbst. Deutsche Kommunisten: Biographisches Handbuch, bis Apropos Margarete Buber-Neumann Volume I Die Marzkampfe Der Nachrichtendienst der KPD, Nationalsozialistische deutsche Arbeiter-Partei and associated issuances. Geheime Staatspolizei and other German police records of clandestine Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands activities from East German Ministerium fur Staatssicherheit files Nationalsozialistische Monatshefte Angriff Volkischer Beobachter Germany and You published in Berlin for English-language readers.
Sturmer Deutsche Aufbauhilfe newsletters Fichte-Bund newsletters published in English in Hamburg World-Service newsletters published in English in Erfurt Goebbels, Josef Kampf um's Dritte Reich: Historische Bilderfolge Lohe, Werner A. Mailing list for German propaganda publications to addresses in California Weinreich, Max. Weltkampf: Das Judenfrage in Geschichte und Gegenwart German exile issuances Soviet and other communist pamphlets Anti-Nazi organization issuances Constantine, Murray.
Swastika Night Kipp, Bruce Eric. Kleist, Peter. Auch du warst dabei Department of State publication Sergeev, F. Miscellany Soviet and other Communist issuances Erkampft des Menschenrecht East German publication Zur Geschichte der deutschen antifaschistischen Widerstandsbewegung, East German publication; 2 editions Weinert, Ernst. Das Nationalkomitee Freies Deutschland Deutsche, wohin? Sie kampften fur Deutschland East German publication Pauley, Edwin W.
Germany--Reunification period Studies Gotsche, Otto, Unser kleiner Trompeter Heym, Stefan. Nach ruf Norden, Albert. So warden Kriege gemacht! Uber Hintergrude und Technik der Aggression Nowak, Claus. Peridorm Auskunfte uber Ruth Werner Unmenschlichkeit als System Wer ists Wer in der SBZ? Bulletins Militarverlag der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik publications Sozialistische Einheitspartei Deutschlands issuances.
Internal study guides Relations with Communist Party, U. Former Nazis circa Pritzow, Walter. NKWD Sonderlager nr. Youth Selected records from ministry archives Circulars and lists prepared by the ministry of organizations and persons associated with the U. Central Intelligence Agency circa Bundesbeauftragte fur die Unterlagen des Staatssicherheitsdienstes der ehemaligen DDR second activity report Schlomann, F. Fricke, Karl Wilhelm. Die DDR-Staatssicherheit Bohnsack, Gunter and Herbert Brehmer. Inoffizielle Mitarbeiter des Ministeriums fur Staatssicherheit: Richtlinien und Durchfuhrungsbestimmungen Das Worterbuch der Staatssicherheit: Definitionen zur "politisch-operativen Arbeit" Solidaritatskomitee Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands outlawry trial East German reprint of selected portions and commentary.
English translation of selected portions and commentary. Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands undergound issuances. Wissen und Tat Printed issuances Internal documents Material about West German communism Espionage Former Nazis and neo-Nazis Human rights Foner, Philip S. Rearmament Bundeskriminalamt Wiesbaden dossiers of wanted international terrorist suspects Bundesinnenministerium annual security reports Ghana Girl Scouts Gitlow, Benjamin Global Exchange Goff, Kenneth Gold, Harry Goldberger, Sandor J.
Peters Goldman, Emma Letters, telegrams and circulars by Goleniewski Letters, notes, memoranda, legal documents and printed articles about Goleniewski Golitsyn, Anatolii undated. Gollancz, Victor Goodlett, Carlton B. Goodman, Ernest Summit meeting between Gorbachev and President George H.
Bush Gorkin, Julian Gorky, Maxim Gouzenko, Igor Granich, Max Gray Panthers Great Books Foundation Great Britain--Civil rights Communist Review Communist Labour Monthly Pamphlets and leaflets Conference of the Communist Parties of the British Empire Communist Student Marxism Today Communist Campaign Review Congress Views Morning Star Material about British communism Committee to Defeat Revisionism for Communist Unity Communist Action Group Communist Party of Britain New Communist Party Great Britain--Espionage and sedition Great Britain--Fascism and antisemitism Cavendish, Anthony.
Inside Intelligence Fact Labour Party Research Department bulletin Great Britain--Muslims Solidarity Pamphlet series circa International Marxist Group circa Revolutionary Communist Party Socialist Workers Party Workers' International League Workers Revolutionary Party includes predecessor and successor organizations Great Britain--Miscellany Communism Bobolas et al. Economist Newspaper Department of State internal investigation of leaks to press re situation in Greece Green, Gil Green Party Greenglass, David Date uncertain. New Jewel Movement internal documents relating to relations with Cuba New Jewel Movement internal documents relating to relations with miscellaneous countries New Jewel Movement internal documents relating to relations with the Socialist International New Jewel Movement internal documents relating to contacts in the United States.
Maurice Bishop speeches and interview transcript Public releases Internal reports Draft reports circa Department of State study Working materials Studies circa Gilmore, William C. The Grenada Intervention Jacobs, W. Richard and Ian Jacobs. Grenada: The Route to Revolution Moore, John Norton. Law and the Grenada Mission The Grenada Documents The Grenada Papers Grow, Robert W. Guardian Central Intelligence Agency memoranda and dispatches Revolutionary group bulletins Guernsey Guinea Gun control circa Gusev, Sergei Ivanovich undated. Haan, Kilsoo Hahn, Emily Haiti Hall, Gus Hall, Martin Hall, Theodore Hallgren, Mauritz Hallinan, Vincent Halperin, Morton H.
Hambleton, Hugh Hammer, Armand Hanssen, Robert Philip circa Harriman, Averell Harrington, Michael Hawaii Healey, Raymond J. Health Hearst, William Randolph Heiman, Beatrice Helfand, Leon Borisovich Henry, Ernst Herron, Garfield Hess, Rudolf On the other hand, a revolutionary majority, even when once conquered, by no means becomes a permanent and irrevocable patrimony. The proletarian revolution marches over great heights and depths. There are dips in the road, tunnels, and steep declivities. And there will be an ample supply of these heights and depths for decades to come.
That is why the continual selection of revolutionaries, tempering them not only in the struggle of the masses against the enemy but also in the ideological struggle within the party, testing them in the great events and at abrupt turning points, is of decisive importance for the party. Goethe has said that once you acquire a thing, you must win it again and again in order to possess it in reality.
During the first party purge, Lenin recommended that 99 percent of the former Mensheviks be thrown out. He had in mind Menshevism not so much as a conciliatory political line but rather as a psychological type — the adaptationism that constantly seeks protective coloration and is therefore ready to change its colors to Bolshevik red — so as not to have to swim against the stream.
Lenin recommended that the party be pitilessly purged of those who adapt themselves. But after his death these elements began to play a great role in the party and a decisive role in the International. Guralsky crowned and uncrowned the leaders of the French, the German, and other parties; Petrovsky and Pepper directed the Anglo-Saxon world; Rafes taught the Chinese people revolutionary strategy; Borodin became state councilor to the national revolution.
All are variations of one and the same basic type: parasites of the revolution. Needless to say, Stalin's present "left course" has in no sense disquieted this public. On the contrary, all the Petrovskys joyously enter into this left course today, and the Rafeses fight against the right danger.
In this left-centrist campaign, which is three-fourths inflated and purely formal, the adapters feel themselves like fish in the sea, demonstrating cheaply — to themselves and to others — what remarkable revolutionaries they are. At the same time, they remain, more than ever before, true to themselves. If anything can kill the International, it is this course, this regime, this spirit, incarnate in the Petrovskys. One of the chief inspirers and educators of the International after Lenin has undoubtedly been Martynov — a wholly symbolic figure in the history of the revolutionary movement.
The most consistent, and consequently the most dull-witted, theoretician of Menshevism, Martynov remained patiently sheltered from the revolution and the civil war in a comfortable refuge, as a traveler shelters himself from bad weather. He ventured forth into the light of day only in the sixth year after October. In , Martynov suddenly surfaced by publishing an article in the Moscow review Krasnaya Nov. At a session of the Political Bureau, in the spring of , I said in passing, half in jest, half in earnest, but at any rate as a bearer of ill tidings: "Watch out that Martynov doesn't worm his way into the party.
I merely observed that it is obviously impossible to build a large party out of intelligent people only and that Martynov might get in accidentally under some other category. But the joke took a serious turn. Martynov not only wormed his way into the party, but he became one of the chief sources of "inspiration" in the Comintern. He has been brought closer and has been elevated — or rather, they have come closer to him and they have stooped to him — solely because of his struggle against "Trotskyism. He simply continued to fight "permanent revolution" just as he had done for the previous twenty years.
Formerly, he spoke of my underestimation of bourgeois liberalism and bourgeois democracy. He has not changed the cliche: he has only inserted the peasantry. In the Menshevik journals of the period of the reaction, there were plenty of articles by Martynov designed to prove that "Trotskyism triumphed for the moment in October, November, and December " literally when the uncontrolled elements ran riot and extinguished all the torches of Menshevik reason. The highest upsurge of the revolution — October, November, and December — was designated by Martynov as its "Trotskyist" decline.
For him the true upturn began only with the Imperial Duma, with the bloc with the Cadets, and so forth, that is, with the beginning of the counterrevolution. Having weathered in his refuge an infinitely more terrible replay of the "elements running riot" — that is, the October Revolution, the civil war, revolution in Germany and Austro-Hungary, the Soviet upheaval in Hungary, the events in Italy, and so forth, and so on — Martynov came to the conclusion in that the time had come to relight the torch of reason in the Russian Communist Party.
He began where he had left off in the period of Stolypinist reaction. In Krasnaya Nov, he wrote:. Trotsky reasoned much more logically and consistently than either the Bolsheviks or the Mensheviks. But the flaw in his argument was that Trotsky was 'too consistent. Here Martynov tells, with total frankness, what it was that reconciled him to October: the great retreat of the NEP, which was, incidentally, rendered necessary by the retardation of the world revolution. Profoundly convinced that the first three years of the October Revolution were nothing but the expression of the "historic error of Trotskyism," Martynov entered the party and, without waiting for a moment, assumed the role of the heavy artillery in the struggle against the Opposition.
This fact alone illustrates more eloquently than many theoretical arguments the profound evolution that has taken place in the upper circles of the party leadership in these last years.
Comrade B. Livshits, in his unpublished work "Lenin on the Dictatorship of the Proletariat and the Peasantry" at the present moment, serious and conscientious works generally remain in the form of manuscripts; on ticklish questions only the shabby products of the apparatus are printed , gives an instructive political characterization of Martynov in a short note: "It seems to me," he says, "that the political biography of this man invites special attention.
Very much so. He came to the Narodniks after their degeneration had begun, when epigones set the tone toward the middle of the '80s. He came to Marxism and the Social Democracy only to preside over the backsliding of a section of the Social Democrats, from the platform of the Emancipation of Labor group and Lenin's Petersburg Union of Struggle to the platform of opportunist Economism.
Then this old opponent of Iskra came over to Iskra when it was actually becoming the pro-Menshevik "new" Iskra , at the moment when the remaining editors were backsliding from their old political positions. While seeming to play only secondary roles in this group outside the editorial board of Iskra , he actually provided in his 'Two Dictatorships,' the platform for the opportunist-conciliatory tactics of the Mensheviks in the revolution. Subsequently this Menshevik of yesterday, this most venomous anti-Bolshevik, came over to the Bolsheviks, but here again it was just at the moment when their leaders were turning into epigones and were already backsliding from Bolshevik positions.
Remaining here also in secondary roles outside of the Political Bureau and the presidium of the International , he actually provided 'theoretical' inspiration for the struggle against the Bolshevik faction of the party; his articles and speeches constituted a platform for the opportunist and conciliationist tactics of the Stalinists in the Chinese revolution. The "fatality" of this figure coexists excellently with its involuntarily comic side. Slow and heavy of wit, created by nature for the baggage train of the revolution, Martynov is aglow with a noble passion: to make theoretical connections [to put two and two together theoretically].
Since he enters only into declining ideological currents or into declining branches of healthy currents, he manages, in his efforts to combine extremes, to bring every error to the height of absurdity. Having authored "Two Dictatorships" for , he produced, in , the formula "a bloc of four classes," thereby giving theoretical expression to the fact that the Chinese bourgeoisie, with the help of the International, had seated itself firmly astride three other classes: the workers, the peasants, and the urban petty bourgeoisie.
In March , Martynov raised the slogan of a "transfusion of workers' blood into the Kuomintang" — just at the moment when Chiang Kai-shek got down to the business of shedding the workers' blood. When the "Anglo-Russian" and "Chinese" discussions opened up in the party, Martynov relived his youth by serving up the old Menshevism, without modifications or additions, in its most intact and most stupid form.
While others made haste to hunt up and invent a theory to justify the political backsliding, Martynov brought one out of his pocket, thought out long ago, all finished, only slightly forgotten. That gave him a manifest advantage. Now this "fatal" figure is one of the chief inspirers of the Communist International. Supposedly he is teaching revolutionaries how to orient themselves in various situations, to foresee the further course of revolutionary developments, to select cadres in advance, to recognize a revolutionary situation at the proper time, and to mobilize the masses for the overthrow of the bourgeoisie.
A more malicious caricature cannot be imagined. There is a man who now works in the propaganda department of the International — and functions virtually as its director — a certain Lentsner. However insignificant a figure he may be, it is well to say a few words about him, as a by no means accidental part of the whole.
For a certain time, Lentsner worked as an editor of my Works. I first became acquainted with him in this connection. He was a product of the Institute of "Red Professors. This by itself could not be held against him: he was young. He entered politics after the revolution was made. The worst of it was that the chaotic havoc wrought in every field made it possible for him to make his way as a "Red Professor" with a minimum of theoretical resources.
In other words, the revolution for him signified above all a career. His ignorance particularly astonished me. In the annotations that he wrote, not only the thought but also the etymology and the syntax of the honorable "Professor" had to be revised. Above all, attention had to be paid to his excessive zeal: Lentsner resembled less a co-thinker than a sycophant. In this period many impatient careerists and aspirants who had not yet found a place for themselves in the apparatus were still trying their luck here and there.
Indulgence had to be shown for Lentsner's superficial knowledge, however, because the more capable workers were overwhelmed with work: at that time the Oppositionists had not yet been removed from their posts. Lentsner prepared the material for The Lessons of October for me, verified texts, collected quotations under my direction, etc.
When the anti-Trotskyist campaign, a long time in preparation, was launched and was formally connected with The Lessons of October, Lentsner began darting his eyes in every direction and within twenty-four hours he switched his position. To secure himself more safely, he used the material he had prepared in a diametrically contrary sense, that is to say, against "Trotskyism.
Nevertheless Zinoviev took him under his wing and wheedled him into the International. By the side of the Kuusinens and the Martynovs, Lentsner became one of the leaders of the daily work of the International. This Red Professor writes leading articles in the official review of the International. The few lines that I have read sufficed to convince me that Lentsner does not know to this day how to write two consecutive words correctly. But apparently there is no one among the editors of The Communist International to look after not only the Marxism, but even the grammar of the writers.
These Lentsners are characteristic of the apparatus of the International. Lozovsky occupies a leading place in the Red International of Labor Unions and an influential one in the Communist International. If, in the beginning, under the old leadership of the party, his role was purely technical — and even in this capacity was held in serious doubt and regarded as temporary — it is no less true that in this last period Lozovsky has reached the very front ranks. Lozovsky cannot be denied certain aptitudes, a quickness of wit and a certain flair. But all these faculties have an extremely fleeting and superficial character in his case.
He began, I believe, as a Bolshevik but withdrew from the Bolsheviks for many years and became a conciliator. An internationalist during the war, he worked with me in Paris on Nashe SIovo[Our Word], where he always represented the extreme right-wing tendency. In the internal questions of the French labor movement, as in the questions of the International and of the Russian revolution, he inclined invariably to the right — toward pacifist centrism.
In , he was the only one of the Nashe Slovo group that did not join the Bolsheviks.
Register of the Herbert Romerstein collection
He was a fierce enemy of the October Revolution. He remained an enemy until ,1 believe, mobilizing a part of the railway workers and trade unionists in general against the party. He did rally to the October Revolution earlier than Martynov; but at any rate, it was not only after the revolution had been made but also after it had been defended against the most menacing dangers. His knowledge of languages and of life in the Western countries carried him, in those years when the assignment of personnel was still very chaotic, to the Red International of Labor Unions.
In the Political Bureau, when we found ourselves faced with this fact, we all — Lenin first of all — shook our heads; we consoled ourselves by saying that he would have to be replaced at the first opportunity.
But the situation changed. Lenin fell ill and died. The changing of landmarks began, carefully prepared behind the scenes by the apparatus. Lozovsky floated to the surface.
He found himself right in his element. Had he not polemicized against me during the war in defense of Longuetism and petty-bourgeois democracy in Russia? Had he not polemicized against the October Revolution, the Red terror, the civil war? After a brief pause, he resumed the struggle against "Trotskyism. At the height of the Martynovist course, Lozovsky even stood on the left wing to a certain extent. But that is dangerous neither for Lozovsky nor for the International; for, despite all his apparent rashness, Lozovsky is perfectly aware of the limits beyond which leftism ceases to be encouraged.
As frequently happens, an impulsive spirit mingles in Lozovsky with a conservatism in ideas. In a stirring article he can call upon the workers of South Africa or the natives of the Philippine Islands to overthrow their bourgeoisie, and forget his own counsel an hour later.
- The Michelle Diaries.
- The Rock Stars Secret Obsession.
- Neue Gesetze: Für Hund und Halter wird es ernst in Tirol.
But in every serious instance where he is responsible for decisions that must be made, Lozovsky invariably makes for the right. He is not a man of revolutionary action; he is an organic pacifist. The future will demonstrate this more than once. The question of the leadership of the young parties of the East, which have colossal tasks before them, forms the darkest page of the International after the death of Lenin. It is enough to say that there a leading role is given to Raskolnikov.
Contrary to those whom I have named before, he is incontestably a fighting revolutionary, a Bolshevik with something of a revolutionary past. But only the frightful devastation of the leading ranks could bring things to the point where Raskolnikov turns up as a leader of — Russian literature and the Asiatic revolutions. He is just as ill-suited for the one as for the other. His deeds were always better than his speeches and articles. He expresses himself before thinking.
It is certainly not bad to have him on your side in a civil war. But it is bad to have him on your side in an ideological conflict. When he returned from Afghanistan in , Raskolnikov was bursting with eagerness for battle on the side of the Opposition. I had to hold him back very insistently, for fear that he would do more harm than good.
For this reason or for another, he became an active fighter a few days later — in the other camp. I do not know if he studied the East very much during his sojourn in Afghanistan. But he did write lengthy memoirs of the first years of the revolution, in which he thought it necessary to devote not a little space to the author of these lines. In , he revised his memoirs — which had already been published — and where he had put a plus sign before he now put a minus sign, and vice versa. This revision has such a primitive and puerile character that it cannot be taken seriously even as a falsification.
At bottom, his is an essentially primitive manner of thought. Raskolnikov's activity in the domain of proletarian literature will constitute one of the most amusing anecdotes in the history of the revolution. But that subject does not interest us here. Raskolnikov's work as the director of the Eastern department of the International has a much more tragic character. It is enough to read Raskolnikov's foreword to the report of T'an P'ing-shan to be convinced once more of the facility with which certain persons relapse into political ignorance when conditions are favorable.
It must of course be added that the report of T'an P'ing-shan was approved by the seventh plenum of the Executive Committee of the International [November ]. Just think of what pains and resources are wasted to lead people off the right road. Raskolnikov is not so much the responsible inspirer as he is the victim of this whole mechanism. But his unfortunate role as leader becomes, in turn, a source of the greatest mishaps and victims.
The Indian movement is represented in the International by Roy. It is doubtful if greater harm could be done to the Indian proletariat than was done by Zinoviev, Stalin, and Bukharin through the medium of Roy. In India, as in China, the work has been and is oriented almost totally toward bourgeois nationalism. In the whole period since Lenin, Roy has conducted propaganda in favor of a "people's party" which, as he himself has said, should be "neither in name nor in essence" the party of the proletarian vanguard.
This is an adaptation of Kuomintangism, of Stalinism, and of La Folletteism to the conditions of the national movement in India. Politically this means: through the medium of Roy, the leadership of the International is holding the stirrup for the future Indian Chiang Kai-sheks. As for Roy's conceptions, they are a hodgepodge of Social Revolutionary ideas and liberalism flavored with the sauce of the struggle against imperialism. While the "Communists" organize "workers' and peasants' parties," the Indian nationalists are seizing hold of the trade unions. In India the catastrophe is being prepared just as methodically as it was in China.
Roy has taken the Chinese example as a model, and he appears at the Chinese congresses as a teacher. It is not necessary to say that this national democrat, poisoned by an adulterated "Marxism," is an implacable foe of "Trotskyism," just like his spiritual brother T'an P'ing-shan. Things are no better in Japan. As fast as the leadership of the International was drained, Katayama became one of its Bolshevik pillars.
To tell the truth, Katayama is by nature a complete mistake. Unlike Klara Zetkin, he cannot even be called a decorative figure, for he is totally devoid of any adornment.
Oh no, there's been an error
His conceptions form a progressivism very lightly colored by Marxism. By his whole make-up, Katayama is incomparably closer to the ideological world of Sun Yat-sen than to that of Lenin. This does not prevent Katayama from expelling the Bolshevik-Leninists from the International, and in general from deciding the destinies of the proletarian revolution by his vote. In return for his services in the struggle against the Opposition, the International supports Katayama's fictitious authority in Japan.
The young Japanese Communists look upon him with deference and follow his teachings. It is not for nothing that there is a Japanese proverb: "Even the head of a sardine can be worshipped; the main thing is to have faith. In the meantime, endless attempts are being made in Japan to unite the various "workers' and peasants' parties" of the right, center, and left, which constitute, all of them to the same degree, an organized assault upon the political independence of the proletarian vanguard.
The diplomatic notes and counter-notes, the unity conferences and counter-conferences, increase and multiply, absorbing and corrupting the very few Communists, diverting them from the real work of rallying and educating the worker-revolutionaries. The press of the International gives hardly any news of the real revolutionary work of the Japanese Communists, of the illegal work, the building of the organization, the party's proclamations, etc.
On the other hand, we learn almost every week of new steps by a new committee for the reorganization of the left workers' and peasants' party in the direction of a union with the left wing of the centrist workers' and peasants' party, which, in turn, approaches the left wing of the right party, and so on without end. What has Bolshevism to do with this? What can Marx and Lenin have in common with this obscene trafficking?
But we will have to return more basically to the burning questions of the East from another point of view. As can be seen, the general spirit of the changes that have taken place in the leadership of the International appears in full light in the procession of its responsible figures. The International is led by the Martynovs, by the conformers of every description. If the republicans had to become reconciled to the empire, the royalists and the Bonapartists, in their turn, had to get used to the republic.
They did not do this right away, but only after convincing themselves of the stability of the republican regime. They are not the republicans who fought for the republic, but those who graciously accepted positions and stipends from it. They are the ones who are called rallies. But one must not think that this type is peculiar only to the bourgeois revolution. The basis of ralliement is not the revolution but its victory, and the state created by this victory.
It goes without saying that true fighters, especially in other countries, not only among the younger generation but in a certain measure also among the older generation, have rallied and are rallying to the October Revolution. But the present regime in the International does not permit them to rise to the level of independent leaders, not to speak of revolutionary chiefs.
It removes, sweeps away, deforms, and tramples under foot all that is independent, ideologically firm, and inflexible. It needs conformists. And it finds them without much difficulty, groups them together, and arms them. The rallies include people of many shadings, from politically dull but honest elements, devoid of perspicacity and initiative, to out-and-out careerists. But even the best of these rallies as psychology suggests and experience proves demonstrate toward new revolutions the same qualities that they showed before and even on the eve of October: lack of foresight, of creative initiative, and of real revolutionary courage.
The Kolarovs, the Peppers, the Kuusinens, the Waleckis, the Martynovs, the Petrovskys, the Lozovskys, and the other heroes who overslept, missed, or destroyed one, two, three, and even more revolutions, are undoubtedly saying to themselves: "Let a new revolution come our way and this time we will prove ourselves. Remembering their faults and uneasy at the idea that they have not been forgotten, these postrevolutionary revolutionists are always ready, on a sign from above, to prove their fearlessness to the four corners of the earth.
That is why missed revolutionary situations alternate with no less tragic revolutionary adventures. The best that can be done with all the varieties of Martynovs, Kuusinens, and Peppers is to keep them a good long distance away from the institutions where the destinies of the revolution are decided. One can object that all the figures I have enumerated above are only of the second order and that the "real" leadership is concentrated in the Political Bureau of the Russian Communist Party. But that is an illusion. Under Lenin, the immediate leadership of the affairs of the International was entrusted to Zinoviev, Radek, and Bukharin.
In the solution of all questions of any great substance Lenin and the author of these lines took part. Needless to say, in all the fundamental questions of the International, the key was in the hands of Lenin. Not one of the present members of the Political Bureau, with the exception of Bukharin, took the slightest part in the leadership of the International, and naturally that was not by mere chance. The nature of this work presupposes not only a certain theoretical and political level, but also the direct knowledge of the internal life of the Western countries and the knowledge of languages, permitting one to follow the foreign press continually.
In the present Political Bureau, no one possesses even these formal qualifications, with the exception of Bukharin, who, while Lenin lived, was only a candidate member of the Political Bureau. Lenin's Testament, at first glance, gives Bukharin a somewhat contradictory characterization. On the one hand, he is spoken of as "a most valuable and major theorist of the party"; on the other hand it is pointed out that "his theoretical views can be classified as fully Marxist only with great reserve, for there is something scholastic about him he has never fully understood dialectics " [Collected Works, vol.
How can a nondialectician and a scholastic be a theoretician of a Marxist party? I will not dwell upon the fact that the Testament, written for the party with a definite aim, is permeated with the desire to "balance off — to a certain extent — the comments on the leading figures of the party: Lenin carefully withholds any too marked praise just as he softens too harsh a judgment. Still, this has reference only to the form of the Testament and not to its essence, and it does not explain how the Marxist works of a writer who has not mastered dialectics can be "valuable.
Dialectics does not do away with formal logic, just as synthesis does not do away with analysis, but is, on the contrary, supported by it. Bukharin's mode of thought is formally logical and abstractly analytical through and through. His best pages are in the domain of formally logical analysis. Wherever Bukharin's thought moves along the furrows already dug by the dialectical blade of Marx and Lenin, it can give valuable partial results, even if they are almost always accompanied by an aftertaste of scholasticism.
But where Bukharin penetrates independently into a new sphere, where he is obliged to combine elements borrowed from different fields — economics and politics, sociology and ideology, or in general, the base and the superstructure — he manifests a completely irresponsible and untenable arbitrariness, pulling generalizations out of the clouds and juggling the ideas as if they were balls. If you took the pains to assemble and classify chronologically all the "theories" that Bukharin has served up to the International since , and especially since , you would end up with a scene from some Walpurgis Night, with the wan shades of Marxism being whipped about wildly by the icy winds of scholasticism.
The Sixth Congress of the International brought the contradictions of the apparatus regime to its ultimate expression, and therefore to the point of absurdity. Outwardly, the leadership seemed to belong to Bukharin: he made the report; indicated the strategical line; presented the program and saw it adopted — no trifle, that — and, lastly, opened and closed the congress with general summaries.
His domination seemed complete. And in the meantime everyone knows that the real influence of Bukharin upon the congress was next to nothing. The interminable babblings of Bukharin were like bubbles thrown up by a drowning man. In the meantime, without regard to the spirit of the reports — nay, even counter to this spirit — a regrouping went on among the delegates and their factional organization was consolidated.
This monstrous duplicity disclosed what a secondary, subordinate, and even decorative role is played after all by "ideology" under the bureaucratic regime of the apparatus. But now that there is no longer any reason to speak of the leadership of Bukharin, inasmuch as the main point of the Sixth Congress was to liquidate him, there remains Stalin.
But here we fall from one paradox into another: for the man who is called today, with some justice, the leader of the International, did not even show up at the congress, and in his most recent speeches disposed of the questions of the program and the strategy of the International with a few meaningless phrases. And that again is no accident. There is no need at all to dwell upon the grossly empirical character of Stalin's policy.
With more or less belatedness, it is only the passive reflection of subterranean class impulses. The strength of apparatus centrism for a certain period and under certain conditions lies in an empirical adaptation. But that is precisely its Achilles' heel. Those who do not know him find it difficult to imagine the primitive level of Stalin's scientific knowledge and theoretical resources.
When Lenin was alive, it never occurred to any of us to draw Stalin into discussions of theoretical problems or strategic questions of the International. The most he ever had to do was to vote sometimes on this or that question whenever the differences of opinion among the Russian leaders of the International necessitated a formal vote in the Political Bureau. In any case, up to it is impossible to find a single article, a single speech of Stalin dedicated to international problems. But this "special feature" — the fact that he was not bound personally by any ideological obligation or tradition to the fundamental theoretical and international questions — rendered him only all the more fit to lead the policy of retreat when the classes crushed by the October Revolution began to rise again in our country and to exert pressure upon the party.
Stalin became necessary when the October film began to run backwards. Well, Stalin is the great man "invented" by the period of the reaction against October. It is known that Marxism does not at all "deny" the personal factor in history; on the contrary, better than any other doctrine, it is capable of elucidating the historical function of an outstanding personality. But the fetishism of the personal factor is entirely alien to Marxism.
The role of a personality is always explained by the objective conditions contained in class relationships. There have been historical periods in which, according to the expression of an intelligent enemy, Ustryalov, "to save the country," an outstanding mediocrity and nothing more proved necessary.
In his Eighteenth Brumaire, Marx showed, according to his own words, "how the class struggle created the circumstances and the conditions that permitted a mediocre and vulgar personage to play the role of a hero. The social subsoil of this Bonaparte's power was the dispersed mass of small peasant proprietors, in a situation where the bourgeoisie and the proletariat neutralized one another's influence.
Essential elements of such a situation exist among us also. It is entirely a question of the mutual relationship of forces and the trends of development. We are still fighting to influence those trends. But in the meanwhile it is incontestable that the further the Stalinist regime goes, the more it appears as a dress rehearsal for Bonapartism. Small-mindedness and contempt for questions of principle have always accompanied Stalin. In , the Tiflis party paper, Zarya Vostoka [Dawn of the East], did him a bad turn by publishing his letter of January 24, In this letter Stalin calls Lenin's bloc with Plekhanov for the struggle against the liquidators and the conciliators a "foreign tempest in a teapot" — neither more nor less — and then continues:.
My opinion is that the result will be best. It was intercepted by the tsarist police and published along with other police files on Stalin in Zarya Vostoka on December 23, Stalin had first used the term "tempest in a teapot" to describe Lenin's philosophical polemics with Bogdanov in a June letter. Thus, in , Stalin disdainfully left it to Lenin to "get into a rage" in his struggle against liquidationism. As for the group that Lenin formed ideologically, Stalin called it contemptuously "a foreign tempest in a teapot.
But it is not only a matter of In the spring of , the semi-defender of the Fatherland, Stalin, was in agreement in principle that the party should unite with the defender of the Fatherland, Tseretelli. In the minutes, concealed up to now, of the party conference in April , we read:. It is necessary to define our proposals as to the terms of unification. Unification is possible along the lines of Zimmerwald-Kienthal. To the fears expressed by certain delegates to the conference, Stalin replied:.
There is no party life without disagreements. We will live down trivial disagreements within the party. The differences with Tseretelli appeared to Stalin as "trivial disagreements," just as six years earlier Lenin's theoretical struggle against liquidationism seemed to him "a tempest in a teapot. Let us quote another letter of Stalin, written on August 7,, on the situation in Germany: "Should the Communists at the present stage try to seize power without the Social Democrats? Are they sufficiently ripe for that? That, in my opinion, is the question.
When we seized power, we had in Russia such resources in reserve as a the promise of peace; b the slogan: land to the peasants; c the support of the great majority of the working class; and d the sympathy of the peasantry. At the moment the German Communists have nothing of the kind. They have of course a Soviet country as a neighbor, which we did not have; but what can we offer them? That, in the 'best' case. While at worst, they would be smashed to smithereens and thrown way back. The whole point is not that Brandler wants to 'educate the masses' but that the bourgeoisie plus the right-wing Social Democrats [are] bound to turn such lessons — the demonstration — into a general battle at present all the odds are on their side and exterminate them [the German Communists].
Of course, the Fascists are not asleep; but it is to our advantage to let them attack first: that will rally the entire working class around the Communists Germany is not Bulgaria. Besides, all our information indicates that in Germany fascism is weak. In my opinion the Germans should be restrained and not spurred on.
To this amazing document, which we must refrain from analyzing here, it must simply be added that in the spring of , before the arrival of Lenin in Russia, Stalin did not pose the question of the conquest of power in any more revolutionary a manner than he did in with regard to Germany.
Is it not evident that Stalin is therefore the most qualified person to brandish the thunderbolts over Brandler and the right wing in general? As to Stalin's theoretical level, finally, it is enough to recall that, in seeking to explain why Marx and Engels rejected the reactionary idea of socialism in one country, he declared that in the epoch of Marx and Engels "there could be no question of the law of uneven development in the capitalist countries.
That is what was written on September 15, ! What would be said of a mathematician who came to maintain that Lagrange, Hauss, or Lobachevsky could not yet know of logarithms? With Stalin this is no isolated case. If the chopped-up eclecticism of his speeches and his articles is examined, one will perceive that they consist almost entirely of such pearls and diamonds of almost virginal ignorance.
In his attacks, first against "Trotskyism," then against Zinoviev and Kamenev, Stalin always struck at the same target: the old revolutionary emigres. The emigres are people without roots who think only of the world revolution. The struggle against the emigres, which is in a sense the continuation of Stalin's letter against Lenin, is an integral part of the Stalinist ideology of national socialism.
Only a complete ignorance of history allows Stalin to have open recourse to this manifestly reactionary argument. After every revolution, the reaction began with the struggle against the emigres and foreigners. Were the October Revolution to recede to another stage on the Ustryalovist road, the next, the third set of leaders would certainly set themselves to hunting down the professional revolutionaries in general: for while these cut themselves off from life, going underground, those others, the new "leaders," were always rooted in the soil!
In truth, never did the provincial-national narrow-mindedness of Stalin appear so brutally as in this scheme to make the old revolutionary emigres into bogeymen. For Stalin, emigration signifies the abandonment of the struggle and of political life. It is organically inconceivable to him that a Russian Marxist, having lived in France or the United States, should have engaged in the struggle of the French or the American working class, not to speak of the fact that most of the time, the Russian emigres performed important functions in the service of the Russian revolution.
It is curious that Stalin does not observe that his "well-rooted" blows against the old "uprooted" emigres strike first of all at the Executive Committee of the International, which is composed of foreign emigres in the Soviet Union where they are invested with the leadership of the international labor movement. But it is upon himself, as "leader" of the International, that Stalin is striking the most painful blows: for it is impossible to imagine a more consummate "emigre" — that is to say, a more isolated one — than he is toward all the foreign countries.
Without any knowledge of the history and the internal life of the foreign countries, without personal knowledge of their labor movements, without even the possibility of following the foreign press, Stalin is today called upon to hammer out and to settle the questions of the world revolution. In other words, Stalin is the most perfect incarnation of the caricatured type of emigre pictured in his imagination. That also explains why the incursions of Stalin into the field of international questions, beginning with the autumn of the day and the date can be established without difficulty , have always this episodic, broken, accidental character, without being any the less injurious for that.
It is not by chance that Stalin's thoroughly cynical empiricism and Bukharin's passion for playing with generalizations have marched side by side for a relatively long period. Stalin acted under the influence of direct social impulses; Bukharin, with his little finger, set heaven and hell into motion in order to justify the new zigzag.
Stalin regarded Bukharin's generalizations as an unavoidable evil. In his heart, he believed as before that there was no reason to get excited over theoretical "tempests in a teapot. Interests become fastened to ideas. Basing themselves upon interests, ideas weld people together.
Thus, while serving Stalin, Bukharin nourished the right group theoretically, while Stalin remained the practical organizer of the centrist zigzags. Therein lies the reason for their parting of the ways. At the Sixth Congress, this split became all the more scandalously obvious, the more they tried to disguise it. Stalin's real, but not purely formal, interest in the International is determined by the anxiety to get the necessary support from the leading cadres for the next zigzag in domestic policy.
In other words, what is demanded from the International is apparatus obedience. At the Sixth Congress, Bukharin read from a letter of Lenin to Zinoviev and himself in which he warns them that if the sensible but not necessarily obedient people in the International are driven out and replaced by obedient idiots, they will certainly destroy it. Bukharin risked bringing forward these lines only because they were necessary to defend himself against Stalin. In actuality, Lenin's warning, which rings so tragically today, embraces the regimes of Zinoviev and of Bukharin, as well as of Stalin.
This part of Lenin's legacy has also been trampled under foot. At the present moment, not only in the Russian Communist Party but in all the foreign Communist parties without exception, all the elements that built up the International and led it in the period of the first four congresses have been removed from leadership and cut off from the party. This general change of the leading cadres is of course not accidental. The line of Stalin requires Stalinists and not Leninists.
That is why the Peppers, the Kuusinens, the Martynovs, the Petrovskys, the Rafeses, the Manuilskys, and their sort are so useful and irreplaceable. Adaptation is their native element. In seeking to obtain the obedience of the International, they realize their highest destiny.
For many of these parasites, the maximum of bureaucracy has become the preliminary condition for their maximum personal "freedom. At the same time they feel themselves to be the direct heirs of the October Revolution and its harbingers throughout the world. What more do they need? Verily, they are building an International in their own image. This "work," however, contains a fatal deficiency: it does not take into account the resistance of the material, that is to say, the living masses of the workers.
In the capitalist countries, the resistance appears much sooner, for there the Communists have no apparatus of coercion. Despite all their sympathy for the October Revolution, the working masses are by no means disposed to put confidence in every cudgel appointed as a leader or to worship the "head of a sardine.
They learn from great events. But now they see nothing but mistakes, confusion, and defeats. The worker-Communists feel the atmosphere growing cold around them. Their uneasiness is transformed into ideological ferment, which becomes the basis for factional groupings. It is clear: the International has entered a period in which it must pay heavily for the sins of the last six years, in the course of which ideas were treated like worthless bank notes, revolutionaries like functionaries, and the masses like an obedient chorus.
The gravest crises are still to come. The ideological needs of the proletarian vanguard are breaking through, bursting the barrel-hoops of the apparatus. The false monolithism is crumbling to dust in the International more rapidly than in the Russian Communist Party, where the holding devices of the party apparatus have already been entirely replaced by economic and governmental repression. It is not necessary to point out the danger represented by factional splitting. But up to now no one has succeeded in overcoming factionalism by lamentations. The conciliationism about which they complain so much in all the resolutions is still less capable of weakening factionalism.
It is itself a product of the factional struggle and, at the same time, the partly processed material for new struggles. Conciliationism is unavoidably called upon to differentiate itself and to be reabsorbed. Every palliation or concealment of differences of opinion would only increase the chaos and give the factional formations a more durable and painful character. The growing turmoil of factionalism can be overcome only by means of a clear line of principle. From this standpoint, the present period of avowed ideological struggle is a profoundly progressive reality. One should remember, however, to compare it not with the abstract ideal of "unity" but with the bitter reality of these last years.
Three basic lines have come to light on an international scale. The line of the right, which is a hopeless attempt to resuscitate, under new conditions, the prewar Social Democracy, in the best case of the type of Bebel Brandler and others. The line of the left, which is the continuation and the further development of Bolshevism and the October Revolution. That is our line. Finally, the line of the center Stalin and his partisans , which wavers between the two principal lines, shrinking back from one at one moment and from the other at the next, devoid of any principled content of its own and always, in the last analysis, serving as a screen for the right wing.
Auch mit ihm konnte der autobesessene Hitler sofort loslegen. Roosevelt kam nur langsam voran. Sie bedienten sich in ihren Kampagnen der modernsten Techniken. Sonst aber hatten sie nicht viel gemein. Seine Herkunft ist verschwommen.
Ex-ÖSV-Trainer von Innsbrucker Staatsanwaltschaft enthaftet
Im Gegensatz zu Hitler, der nahezu aus dem Nichts auftauchte, stammte Roosevelt aus der damals wohl bedeutendsten Politikerfamilie Amerikas und aus der Ureinwanderer-Elite der Nation. Urvater Claes Martenszen Van Rosenvelt war im Sie kenne keinen Menschen, gestand die beachtliche Eleanor, der sich weniger von anderen beeinflussen lasse als ihr Ehemann Franklin. Niemand begriff ihn vollkommen. Er polarisierte und blieb dabei immer auf der richtigen Seite. Gebildet, aber nicht sehr belesen. Populistisch, doch im Kern verschlossen. Nie zeigte er sich im Rollstuhl. Hitler war ihm nicht gewachsen.
In seiner Kindheit war er neunmal in Europa. Doch im Ersten Weltkrieg wandelte sich sein Deutschland-Bild rasch. Es gab sie auf beiden Seiten. Krieg ist Krieg. Jeder schien dem anderen nahezu abstrakt und nicht aus Fleisch und Blut. Jeder empfand das Land des anderen wie einen fremden Stern. Er war stets auch sein eigener Propagandist. Botschafter wurde William Dodd, ein angesehener Historiker, der in Leipzig promoviert hatte. Damit glaubte er die USA ruhiggestellt. Im Gegenteil.
Er redete sich mit anderen Terminen heraus und schickte Hjalmar Schacht. Andere Ergebnisse gab es nicht. Er war nun das Recht selber. Damit unterstand ihm die Armee. Die U.
Navy galt als nicht einsatzbereit. Denn bei den Nazis ging es nun Schlag auf Schlag. Nachdem Hitler am Und dann kamen, am Inhalt: keine Waffenlieferungen an Konfliktparteien. Frankreich, psychisch abwesend, schickte keine Truppen. Es begannen seine vielen unblutigen Gebietsgewinne. US-Botschafter Bullit allerdings sah nun mit 65prozentiger Sicherheit!
Was denn auch geschah. Bei Roosevelt entstand nun der Gedanke, nach dem er in den kommenden acht Jahren einsam handelte. An den Rollstuhl gebunden, nahm er sich oft Zeit zur Reflexion. Gegen Ende seiner ersten Amtsperiode wurde Roosevelt, ein anderer war ja auch nicht sichtbar, zum Welt-Staatsmann. Mit den subtileren Mitteln des demokratischen Prozesses. Das verursachte in der reichlich von Juden bewohnten Stadt New York am 3. Diplomatisch war das starker Tobak. Er galt als Echo Hitlers. Doch da marschierte Hitler am Damit hatte er zwar noch nicht alles ausgereizt, wohl aber die Grenzen seines eigenen Charakters.
Die Sicherungen schlugen durch. Das war die letzte Chance, ihn zu lokalisieren. Er brauchte Zeit. Man nannte das frivol die "Reichskristallnacht".